Skip to content

Has the religious right fostered less religious identification?

People of faith do wonderful things. They feed the hungry, shelter the homeless and demonstrate a compassion often lacking in the secular world.

Unfortunately, so-called people of faith are also hypocritical, judgmental and determined to impose their beliefs on those who see things differently.

Most people don’t identify with the latter group, which has come to represent religion, namely Christianity, in America for three decades now. The result:

In “American Religion: Contemporary Trends,” author Mark Chaves argues that over the last generation or so, religious belief in the U.S. has experienced a “softening” that effects everything from whether people go to worship services regularly to whom they marry. Far more people are willing to say they don’t belong to any religious tradition today than in the past, and signs of religious vitality may be camouflaging stagnation or decline.

“Reasonable people can disagree over whether the big picture story is one of essential stability or whether it’s one of slow decline,” said Chaves. “Unambiguously, though, there’s no increase.”

Science + Religion Today notes that this has been a trend since the 1950s but the number of Americans claiming no religious affiliation has accelerated greatly since 1990.

Michael Hout and Claude Fischer, sociologists at the University of California, Berkeley, claim—and I think they are basically right— that it is part of the reaction to the religious right’s rising visibility in the 1980s. That is, before 1990, people who were raised, say, Catholic or Baptist, but were socially and politically liberal and already religiously inactive, would still be comfortable enough with their religious background to tell a pollster they were Catholic or Baptist. And then they saw all this conservative politics happening in the name of religion, in the name of their own religion maybe, and said, “You know what, I’m not that.”





One thought on “Has the religious right fostered less religious identification? Leave a comment

  1. I suspect that you are right on this issue. Many, many people that I have known don’t like that the pulpit has been used for political uses. Especially when it has a right slant. What many of those religious people don’t understand is that their position is one of dominion and eventual take over, whether they say that or not. They think that religion is a battle and that their savior will win.

    Very infrequently is it used to advance civil rights or social causes that aid humanity.

    Dominionism is the new current buzzword that describes these people.

    They are also on the verge of making the Republican party the anti-science party with their views of creationism, climate change, and Biblical inerrancy.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: