The following e-mail, written by a delegate to the NEA’s recent convention, reveals much about the corrupt teacher’s union:
I’m quite upset. NEA withheld [sic] its endorsement of any Presidential Candidate (we’ll be voting to officially nominate Barak [sic] in a few days) so that the two candidates could have time to do their thing and win; it also afforded us the luxury of not splitting our membership into one camp or the other and damaging our collective ability to support whoever the nominee [sic]. Yet despite this, Obama will be addressing us by video feed, not in person. When we were told about this, a murmur of disappointment spread across the room– to be sure, teachers in my delegation are taking this as an affront—it’s all Hillary supporting teachers need to not vote for him…just one more reason.
She probably teaches English. The NEA, apparently satisfied with having the 18th best education system in the world, fights to protect such teachers from being fired.
The union’s unofficial motto: Their are no such thing as bad teacher, only student who not learn.
I’m not denigrating all teachers. But as a graduate of America’s public schools, I would guess no more than half are skilled at what they do. The other half need not worry, however, as long as politicians continue to pander to the NEA.
[...] Which leads nicely into the final item. ATLMalcontent shares an email from a grammar-challenged delegate who attended the National Education Association [...]