Dupe du jour

Media_httpatlmalconte_hiivc

I’m breathlessly awaiting Sean Penn‘s Venezuelan report card. Wonder if he’ll mention his buddy Hugo‘s clampdown on press freedom? Or his abysmal human rights record?

Won’t matter to Penn, as long as Hugo maintains his rhetorical battle with the U.S. Funny how someone who takes himself so seriously can be so seriously misguided. (BTW, Sean, you’re not a journalist. Propagandist, maybe.)

So what have you got against Hillary?

Many things, actually, but Andrew Sullivan expertly sums up one of my major beefs:

The words that come out of Clinton’s mouth are like round, honed pebbles on a beach of public relations and focus groups. She has got it down, and it’s smooth and round and aesthetically pleasing. But I don’t believe it or even hear it except as a series of ever shifting calculations. I know some of this is inevitable in politics. But it has come to drain our political discourse of real meaning and clarity.

Gotta disagree with the “aesthetically pleasing” assertion — cue Phyllis Diller orgasm.

Dupe du jour

Spectrum674040I’m breathlessly awaiting Sean Penn‘s Venezuelan report card. Wonder if he’ll mention his buddy Hugo‘s clampdown on press freedom? Or his abysmal human rights record?

Won’t matter to Penn, as long as Hugo maintains his rhetorical battle with the U.S. Funny how someone who takes himself so seriously can be so seriously misguided. (BTW, Sean, you’re not a journalist. Propagandist, maybe.)

So what have you got against Hillary?

Many things, actually, but Andrew Sullivan expertly sums up one of my major beefs:

The words that come out of Clinton’s mouth are like round, honed pebbles on a beach of public relations and focus groups. She has got it down, and it’s smooth and round and aesthetically pleasing. But I don’t believe it or even hear it except as a series of ever shifting calculations. I know some of this is inevitable in politics. But it has come to drain our political discourse of real meaning and clarity.

Gotta disagree with the “aesthetically pleasing” assertion — cue Phyllis Diller orgasm.

Guilty is as guilty does

I respect James for his measured take on the Michael Vick case, but damning evidence continues to mount against the Falcons QB. James cites an ESPN article on the history of race relations in Atlanta — and how the city’s past factors into whether you think Vick innocent or guilty — but the article badly misses the point.

Michael Vick is a symbol of how things have changed for the better. Atlanta has been very good to him. Sure, there were critics, but he deserved to be criticized. Vick’s play was uneven at best, and his performance off the field was likewise checkered. Racists didn’t imagine Ron Mexico, and there was no conspiracy to plant weed in a water bottle at a Miami airport (more likely, his enablers — most of them white — called in a few favors and secured a dismissal of charges).

Throughout, he maintained a fervent fan base and a slew of endorsements. No one was out to get Michael Vick. And for the writer of the ESPN article to even mention “lynching” in the same breath as Vick is irresponsible at worst, sloppy journalism at best.

Certainly racism is alive, here and elsewhere. But pampered African-American athletes everywhere have it much better than your average white guy. Sorry, but no one’s giving me free luxury cars to drive, nor interceding on my behalf with the police. Those are advantages. Period. Focusing on the self-inflicted plight of the Pacman Jones’ of the world, at the expense of real victims, does a disservice to any civil rights movement.

I defer, once again, to Cynthia Tucker:

A black woman is secretary of state. A black man is a prominent contender for the Democratic nomination for president. Black Americans are CEOs of Fortune 500 companies, presidents of elite colleges and partners at prestigious law firms. Oprah Winfrey is arguably the most influential woman on the planet. And Vick, for his part, has earned more money than most people on the planet and can certainly take care of himself. Among his dream team of attorneys is Billy Martin, who is one of the nation’s best-known criminal defense lawyers and who also happens to be black. 

Let’s not make Michael Vick a martyr simply because people deduce — based on a preponderance of evidence — his guilt. That’s what happens when you’re famous; everyone has an opinion about you, however irrelevant. A jury will decide what matters. They may decide correctly. O.J. Simpson was found innocent, but only the delusional would argue that verdict was correct. I’m not as certain regarding Vick — in fact, I hope I’m wrong. I don’t want Joey Harrington quarterbacking the Falcons. And I don’t want another African-American hero to fall by the wayside.

But none of us should look the other way, blinded by tired excuses and white liberal guilt. A scoundrel is a scoundrel, and so far that’s the best thing you can say about Michael Vick.

“How many additional dead Americans is Saddam worth? In our judgment, not very many”

When George W. picked Dick Cheney to be his veep in 2000, I was somewhat relieved. I remembered Cheney as a sober Secretary of Defense who seemed much more of an establishment Republican than the reactionary kind (there is a big difference, and the former is much preferable). Practicality seemed to be his M.O. He was an adult in a town of children.

Have you forgotten that Cheney? Watch and marvel at a flip-flop that even Mitt Romney would envy.